Journal article
Composite faces are not (necessarily) processed coactively: A test using systems factorial technology and logical-rule models
XJ Cheng, CJ McCarthy, TSL Wang, TJ Palmeri, DR Little
Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition | AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC | Published : 2018
DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000479
Abstract
Upright faces are thought to be processed more holistically than inverted faces. In the widely used composite face paradigm, holistic processing is inferred from interference in recognition performance from a to-be-ignored face half for upright and aligned faces compared with inverted or misaligned faces. We sought to characterize the nature of holistic processing in composite faces in computational terms. We use logical-rule models (Fifić, Little, & Nosofsky, 2010) and Systems Factorial Technology (Townsend & Nozawa, 1995) to examine whether composite faces are processed through pooling top and bottom face halves into a single processing channel-coactive processing-which is one common mecha..
View full abstractGrants
Awarded by National Science Foundation
Funding Acknowledgements
This work was supported by ARC Discovery Project Grant DP160102360 and a Melbourne Research Grant Support Scheme Grant to Daniel R. Little, and NSF Grant SBE-1257098 and Vanderbilt International Office Grant to Thomas J. Palmeri. Thanks to Adam Osth for helpful discussions about DE-MCMC modeling, and thanks to Rob Goldstone for providing the code used to generate the morphed faces. We thank Daniele Martinie for assistance with data collection. Portions of this work were completed as part of the fulfilment of honours degree projects by Xue Jun Cheng and Callum J. McCarthy.